's response to the statements of Portosalvo "A Restoration sas'
Clarification of the clarification
Sometimes the explanations only add words to deeds. The fact is that even a layman (ie non-professionals) that something in the "restoration" of the Church of Santa Chiara in Naples did not go optimally if it can still be seen traces of an inscription (see photo). The clarification is, however, been of some use: for example in relation to the name of the company who made the speech at Church of Santa Chiara. That we had not been able to read the signs (which the law provides for mandatory during the execution of the restoration work) and that instead we could learn from the press! So much for transparency! As well we are comforted to know that the cards are restored at the offices of architectural and historical-artistic supervision of Naples would be more convenient and relevant to read the signs on the type of restoration required during the restoration. One last thing: there was a race or in the name of the hearing there was a direct call? How much money has been allocated for the operation? Even this was written on signs required, simply because there were no explanatory signs or perhaps were stationed from dusk to dawn, so it was a bit 'difficult to read. Here, if there is an urgent restoration work to be done is that of transparency ...!
Civic Committee Portosalvo
Youth Association Portosalvo
0 comments:
Post a Comment